Ussr - Northern Asia

Are democrats the new USSR since they support leftist dictators like Chavez and Arabs after the USSR collapsed?

Jul 28, 2009 by Ty | Posted in Politics

They impecuniousness Universal Healthcare. Im just saying theyve taken over the role of the Soviet Union

There's so much off the target in that question that it would take a rescue team using the jaws of life 6 hours to pry any surviving meaning out of it.

We don't buttress Chavez. I'm not sure which "Arabs" you're referring to. And "universal healthcare" in some build is enjoyed by the citizens of virtually every capitalist nation on Earth, except the US.

We don't "hate" America. We don't miss to "destroy" America. We don't love the terrorists. We don't hate religion, the troops or the taper off.

But we DO hate stupidity. You might want to write that one down.

Quirk | Jul 28, 2009

Are you presentiment okay? This shows that you guys can't think of any issue with substance to discuss. You have to make ludicrous statements to get a bull session going. Pretty sad if you ask me. Regardless, though, is there something wrong with Arab-Americans?

ThumperDoodle | Jul 28, 2009

Are we playing pin the parson's nose on the logic?

Pluto C. Rat | Jul 28, 2009

No they are not the "New" USSR they are the remnants of the "Beginning" USSR. Before the collapse of the Soviet Union the Russians put thousands of spys in our country. What you see now are the heavily indoctrinated fascinating places of power to rebuild what they lost.

Samurai | Jul 28, 2009

"Increasing" National Socialist Democrats simply hate America and they support anyone who is an enemy of America.

fascistbaraq | Jul 28, 2009

They are the remnants of the USSR. They are the morons that still in the Bolshevik bill of goods.

Ethan M | Jul 28, 2009

Also take into backsheesh that communists always go after families of enemies of the state. Sound familiar?

By the way I think you made them a little bit angry.

eelfins | Jul 28, 2009

I may not accede to with all the people in my neighbor hood - but I try to be a good neighbor and get along .
Same with other countries
Just common sense .

bluechristy | Jul 28, 2009

I make bold you to back up one of your claims with facts.

You need to learn to think on your own before you can play here, Scooter.

Brown9500v1 | Jul 28, 2009

Supporting dictators and Arabs? Bush Sr.? Reagan? Eisenhower?

That's not literally Universal Healthcare they are proposing actually, it's a mixed free market and government proposal. But I can advertise you haven't bothered to read.

Yes, the healthcare in Japan, Western Europe, and Canada is so bad that their life expectancy is much older than the U.S.! But what cordial of life can they have--with all the modern conveniences of the free world, but having your health care fully provided for? And they have less ill tasting food too. So terrible.......

Composer | Jul 28, 2009

No - you lack to stop listening to AM radio - you know they aren't legally required to tell the truth, fitting?

future | Jul 28, 2009

the american communist function (originally) had interorganizational memos about having infiltrate

No More B.S. | Jul 28, 2009

Utter bombast. I have looked into the eyes of your question and have seen the deep evil that lurks there.

Chavez is supported by US customers of his exported oil, no count which party is in control of the USA.

By Arabs, do you mean Saudi Arabia? Our president ALWAYS defers to King Saud. Bush kissed him, Obama bowed to him.

AE Newman | Jul 28, 2009

Hitler and the USSR........?

Jul 27, 2009 by Stan | Posted in History

Please know all then answer my question =)

Ive been wandering, Hitler had to bail Mussolini out in Africa and greece and waisted months in Africa saving Mussolini, however was precious, because the Russian winter was closing in.

Had Hitler waited a year or so, He could have taken Egypt from the British, and entranced the oil, he could have concentrated nearly his full attention on Defeating the British, and invaded Britain, i know the British air-strength was a problem, but had Hitler focused his attention on it, he could have defeated the British air-force because the British air-force was only at best winning.
So then Hitler would now have no enemies in Europe and North Africa, he would have more resources, like the oil in Egypt, he could shape up his army even more, and could wait to attack Russia very early right after the Russian winter had just passed, so he would have not quite a full year before the russian winter would start again.

Hitler would have had more troops, more aircraft (the Luftwaffe) a lot more time, and no enemies in Europe! He would have been in a lot beat position.

My question is, Why the hell did Hitler attack Russia so soon what was the Hurry? Couldn't he of waited a few more months putting him in a much healthier situation?

Thanks for your answers and thanks for reading!
Hitler wasnt intrested in All of Europe, he only wanted his "Living room" which was to the east.

The Americans only joined the war when Hitler declaired war on them in hope the Japanese would help them spell russia to the east, causing the russians to fight a 2 front war

Why are DemocRats pushing for a socialist America like the USSR?

Jul 27, 2009 by Liberals are Terrorists | Posted in Politics

Or even worse Canada!

Love Canada. | Jul 27, 2009

Where can I get film for my Zenith E Camera?

Jul 26, 2009 by Harry B | Posted in Cameras

The Camera is a former USSR- Nebbish E Camera such as this 1 (click link) http://www.rus-camera.com/camera.php?page=zenit&camera=zenite

I thirst for to get film for it, but don't know if it will accept any film or whether I have to get special film for it. Do you know what film I'd need and where to get it from?

Any admonition will be great. Thanks

P.S. Do you know if the camera gives good results?

Please help been up ALL night trying to...?

Jul 26, 2009 by Can | Posted in Homework Help

Conclude my mission. It sounds simple but I've been trying from 10:00pm and now its 12:12am. I cannot think of ANY possible way to conclude it! My assignment is about the differences of the 2 biggest super powers during world war 2 (the USSR and the USA) What should i sum up?????????? i cannot think atm im so sleepy but its due tomorrow omg im so stressed! ill-starred about that but please you must help or a kitten will kill me

What are the differences between the...?

May 20, 9844 by Can | Posted in Military

USSR and the USA by the end of 1945? Please, I'm Indeed stuck with this for an assignment and i have no idea what to write. All i know is that i have to include military, economical and social differences between the two countries. I would unusually appreciate for a detailed answer that can include links to good web sites. Thanks a ton for helping i indeed appreciate it

National Anthem of USSR

The big anthem of USSR.

Freedom House compares Arab Spring to USSR collapse

20.05.12

PanARMENIAN.Net - Liberty in the World, the report on global freedom issued annually by Freedom House , found more declines than gains worldwide for 2011, saying that developments in the Midriff East touched off the most serious challenge to authoritarian rule since the collapse of Soviet communism.

In a territory that seemed immune to democratic change, coalitions of reformers and ordinary citizens succeeded in removing three seriously entrenched dictators: Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali of Tunisia, and Muammar al-Gadhafi of Libya, the write-up says.

Tunisia has made the greatest strides toward democracy in the Arab world. Though it still faces numerous hurdles, the woods has conducted honest elections, expanded press freedom, and generally chosen authorized mechanisms and pragmatism over extralegal vengeance in dealing with the old elite, it says.

The report continues: Egypt also achieved gains, with formal elections conducted with a degree of fairness that contrasts sharply with the sham procedures of the Mubarak era. More significantly, Egyptians now prefer freer to speak out, even protest, albeit still with considerable risk. But the ruling military board’s crackdown against civil society threatens to undermine the positive that has occurred following Mubarak's departure. In the Middle East alone, compensation against the forces of change led to intensified repression in half a dozen countries, the worst occurrence being Bashar al-Assad’s murderous campaign against the Syrian people.

Source: PanARMENIAN.Net